The D-link Covr-2202 is an AC2200 tri-band mesh router two-pack that takes the original Covr-1203 dual-band fashion statement and ads more power to support more devices and cover a larger area.
Mesh is the flavour of the year as far as home Wi-Fi goes. The Covr-2202 offers a solution to Wi-Fi black spots that a single router cannot. I am still not convinced about mesh over might but have to admit that it works well in certain circumstances.
Co-incidentally this review comes immediately after the Synology MR2200AC tri-band router review, and it may be good to read that first as I covered a lot of Mesh issues. In the end, there is little between both routers – Synology with its NAS background is a strong performer. D-Link with its routing and networking background offers a fashion statement as well as a highly competent mesh router. And, under the bonnet, they use similar components.
Assuming you did not read the Synology review first let me just briefly define the limitations of mesh – and what I mean by using mesh in the right location.
An AC2200 router supports around 10 Wi-Fi or Ethernet
devices – and more if they are not in simultaneous use.
Transmission distance depends on home
construction materials and line-of-sight – assume 10-30 metres in a typical Aussie
home that has walls, floors, cupboards, windows etc.
A mesh ‘slave’ can only retransmit what comes
over the backchannel to the ‘master’ router. Poor backchannel signal means poor
internet and accounts for mist Mesh issues.
not believe any company’s statements of the coverage
area. Not that we are suggesting they are lying – but it is not a perfect world,
and it is astute to cut all claims in
The D-Link Covr-2202 is a fashion statement just as the Covr-1203 is (GadgetGuy review here). A nice, beige, squat (200mm), triangle (100x90mm) that is unobtrusive enough to go anywhere – not like my reference router the D-Link AC5300 DLR-895 that is red, loud and proud with eight spiderlike antennae.
In true GadgetGuy style, we are more interested in what is under the bonnet as that dictates performance. The basic spec sheet is here, and we had to go digging for the important stuff.
Processor, RAM and Storage not listed. It uses the Qualcomm IPQ4019 (same as the Synology MR2200AC) with 16MB RAM and 256MB storage (8MB more ram than the Synology)
2.4Ghz (400Mbps) and two x 5GHz x 866Mbps (one 866Mbps is a backchannel).
2 x Gigabit LAN/WAN ports – may require an existing gateway to connect to the internet
The power supply is 12V/2A (24W), but the 240V adaptors are side mounted taking more than own power point space – bad D-Link!
Six internal antennae (two each for the three bands) MU-MIMO, smart steering, Wave II etc.
It identifies the master, and you set passwords for Wi-Fi login and Admin
You can optionally link to Amazon Alexa or Google
Place the slave where you need it.
Plug in power (those damned wide plugs!)
When the unit has booted is flashes orange, and you return to the app to add it
Along the way it checks and updates the firmware
In all, it should be a
very painless solution. Only it wasn’t.
After a firmware update, it could not find the slave unit and nothing in the app
or the web interface was able to re-add it.
So, I did what all techies do – swear and look for the reset
hole. Sure enough, starting from scratch worked.
Covr can support up to four units with a single SSID. We did
not test this nor if daisy-chaining has any impact on back-channel speeds – it
You can access the router via the app or a web-interface (192.168.100.1)
for a more advanced user interface. Take care any existing gateway does not use
that IP address.
Tests: D-Link Covr-2202
Unsurprisingly the D-Link Covr-2202 performance was similar to the Synology MR2200AC as they both have similar specifications. I found that most Tri-band devices use either the Broadcom chipset or the Qualcomm IPQ4019. Not to oversimplify it, but makers then add their own operating system, antenna design and external covers etc. Apart from looks, they are all much of a muchness. Common Qualcomm based routers include
NETGEAR Orbi RBK-20/30/40/50
Plume Super Pod
We use Network Cell Info to measure speeds as well as the
Android Wi-Fi connection indicator.
Covr-2202 Main router
Covr using Tri-band backchannel (2 bar strength)
1.275Gbps solid (5GHz)
10 metres line of sight
10 metres (two rooms away)
170-340Mbps (occasional 2.4GHz)
*Remember this is the speed of the link to the slave, not
But, the key difference is in the app and user
interface. The Synology app and web interface is extremely comprehensive down to the kilobit data transfer rates. It
gives techies something to use to get the ideal placement.
D-Link is the opposite. There are no handy data transfer rates, and I miss that. Still, Joe and Jane Average do not want to be bamboozled with science, so that is OK. D-Links web interface offers more flexibility.
And it has the full suite of parental controls, guest Wi-Fi etc.
As for all mesh routers the slave needs to be within 7-10 metres, preferably line-of-sight to get the best available backchannel speed. I repeat my advice to try to use Ethernet cable or Powerline adaptors.
We found no difference between Synology and D-Link
suggesting the antenna gain is similar.
The Covr-2202 did get Wi-Fi, albeit at 2.4GHz speeds into our
blackspot. On that basis, it is
acceptable as an AC2200 router and extender.
I linked Mydlink account to Google Assistant. It supports a
limited set of commands like turn on/off guest Wi-Fi, reboot the router and upgrades
firmware. I suspect this list will improve. For the moment it seems more
appropriate to D-Link security cameras, smart plugs and sensors.
GadgetGuy’s take – style or substance
Had I not reviewed the Synology just before the D-Link Covr-2202 I would have said the latter’s fashion statement is enough reason to buy. And, at $499.95 it is in price the ballpark of Netgear’s RBK-40 AC2200 dual pack (also using the same Qualcomm processor). I have not seen Netgear Orbi after the pretty abysmal results on its earlier dual-band mesh. It is time to do so.
So, it is hard to give a clear winner in this category. The
worst I can say is that it is fit for purpose and the best is that it looks
good, does what it promises (apart from coverage area) and it comes from a respected
specialist company. Provided you read all my mesh caveats and understand how it
works then you will get what you want.
Me – I am not convinced Mesh is the panacea yet.
I am waiting for Wi-Fi 6 – AX and D-Link’s PowerZone!
D-Link has the mother of all AC5300 modem/router – the Cobra. Its firmware now supports PowerZone for all the things Mesh was for. I understand its AX 6000, and 11000 routers will support PowerZone as well.
All you need to do it add D-Link AC12000 or DAP-1860 AC2600 MU-MIMO range extender. Then you have a V8 supercar controlling most of your devices and plug the extenders into a powerpoint (or Ethernet point) where you need them. Of course, this is a more expensive option but the only real option for a larger 400-600+ square metre homes.
Value for money
Ease of Use
Reader Rating0 Votes
Similar performance to other Qualcomm based devices
Ultra-simple app with a little more in the web interface
In the price ballpark
D-Link quality and support
For me, the app is a little too simple
Sideways power pack takes up two standard power point slots
Don’t believe any manufacturers coverage statements