CES 2019 was awash with 8K TVs – the next attempt by TV makers to get you to open your wallet and throw away your not so old, perfectly good TV! What happened to TVs being a 10-year purchase?
It seems like only last year that 4K TVs started to gain traction. For the most part, that was due to nearly all TVs in stores being 4K and the gradually increasing content on 4K Blu-ray and streaming services like Netflix.
First, and most important, there are now several dozen 4K LCD TV’s less than $1,000.
These include brand names like Samsung, Sony, LG and Panasonic or 55” no-name brands from $500. If you are going to spend less get a brand name if only for warranty and support.
In fact, at the recent Consumer Electronics Show 2019 TCL, a substantial TV and TV panel maker said that 99% of TVs it sold were under US$2,000 – leaving a scant 1% in the premium category over $2,000. We suggest that TCL was convenient with its stats – most TVs sold are under A$1000!
My spies at JB Hi-Fi confirm that the sweet spot under $1,000 for 55” is $600-700 (Sonic, TCL and Hisense), with 65” at $895-995 (Soniq and TCL). Of the brands/models, it lists, most – 87 – are 4K.
JB’s 4K Brand segmentation is LG (17 models), Samsung (17), Sony (16), Hisense (12), TCL (11), Soniq (7), Panasonic (5) and Teac (2). Price segmentation for TV’s <$1000 (34), $1000-2000 (27), $2000-3000 (12), $3000-4000 (8) and $4,000+ (6). While JB’s range is comprehensive that does not include dozens of the cheaper no-name, online, house and run-out brands – there is so much choice.
Second, and far less important is that my JB Hi-Fi spies say no one comes in looking for an HD/FHD TV any more
4K is what everyone buys because that is what is in the store. They say there is no, repeat, no demand for HD or FHD, let alone 8K. Its more an issue of OLED if you can afford it, backlit Quantum Dot next,
4K comprises a very small part of main-stream content catalogues
According to HD report, there are around 600 4K Blu-ray titles currently (many are duplicated as special or commemorative, repackaged, re-releases) compared with a main-stream catalogue of over 20,000 FHD/DVD/Blu-ray titles – 4K is 3% of the catalogue. That does not include tens of thousands of non-mainstream distribution or country/language specific DVD/Blu-rays.
Netflix lists just over 500 TV series and movies (this has grown substantially from a low base in early 2018) from a catalogue of just under 15,000 titles. Most free-to-air content is HD (720p) with selected channels at FHD (1080p). Foxtel has one 4K channel for its IQ4 box.
8K take-up will be very much slower for several reasons.
Data stream – getting content to the set over the Internet
- 8K resolution is 7680 x 4320 (33,177,600 pixels) – around 100Mbps (Megabits per second) to stream (with substantial buffering).
- 4K is 3840 x 2160 pixels (8,294,400 pixels) – 25Mbps to stream (with limited buffering to keep ahead of play)
- FHD is 1920 x 1080 (2,073,600) – 5Mbps to stream
- HD is 1280 x 720 (921,600) – the latter is what most free-to-air channels transmit.
NBNs top tier is 100Mbps (Megabits), but you cannot sustain that. 8K streaming is not really achievable without huge buffering.
Upscaling is a vital feature of 4K and 8K TVs
Upscaling means adding an extra pixel around the original pixel to approximate a higher resolution image.
4K adds four extra RGB pixels to FHD – interpolating the image. Upscaling from FHD is passable, but from HD is poor.
8K is will have to insert 16 extra pixels to FHD. The images I have seen with my discerning eye are poor – soft focus at best. Imagine upscaling HD!
Imagine blowing up a postcard sized print to A4 – that is what bad upscaling looks like. Sure, with buckets of processing power and lots of AI to interpret metadata you may get an acceptable 4K to 8K upscale.
8K Upscale systems might be technically impressive, but you can’t create fine details from nothing, and upscaling is always inferior to native video.