As a long-time Android user in a family full of iPhone users, I am troubled by iPhone envy in only two ways. The first is the inability to join in with iPhone to iPhone type communications, such as iMessage and Facetime. The second is the damned nonchalance my family members have with regard to their batteries.
I check my battery several times a day and get twitchy once it falls below fifty per cent. My family seem happy to run their iPhones down ten per cent before doing something about it, apparently confident that they won’t run short.
Similarly, I have an iPad Mini and an 8 inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A to test out various apps. The Galaxy fades away over a couple of days unless plugged into power. The iPad Mini can sit there for weeks on end unused and when I have cause to pick it up to install an app, I chastise myself briefly for not having thought ahead and charged it up. And then I discover the battery level is still 70%.
Now, somehow, despite Apple’s claims that the iPhone 7 has battery life improvements over the iPhone 6S, a British website is claiming that at least in some respects its battery life is not so good. Indeed, it headlines that the “iPhone 7 finishes last in our battery life tests”.
“Which?” conducted tests comparing the iPhone 7 against the Samsung Galaxy S7, the LG G5 and the HTC 10. The clear winner was the HTC 10, while the LG G5 and Samsung Galaxy S7 were close and the iPhone 7 was behind. A bit behind on one of the tests, and way, way behind on the other.
How to square that with my experience?
As always, it all depends on what you’re measuring, and how representative that is of actual use. I know for sure my own practice is not representative. I don’t spend a lot of time talking on the phone, and most of the time it’s connected to my WiFi network rather than 4G. I suspect that the tests conducted by Which? may not be representative either, for it tested two things: continuous talk time, and continuous browsing time.
It was in talk time that the iPhone 7 lagged significantly. The HTC scored 1859 minutes, the LG G5 1579 minutes, the Samsung Galaxy S7 1492 minutes, the iPhone way back on 712 minutes, or less than half than the “worst” of the Android phones.
The other measure – browsing time – had the HTC 10 at 790 minutes, the Samsung Galaxy S7 swapping positions with LG at 677 minutes, the LG G5 at 640 minutes and the iPhone 7 a little further back at 615 minutes.
Which? used its own local system to simulate a 3G network for these tests. Kudos to Which? for striving for consistency. Issues such as local cell tower utilisation and signal strength can wreck comparative tests.
Did your eyes kind of glide over all those numbers? Which? kindly put them in graphical form, and they really weren’t any clearer, except in comparison to each other. But what the hell is 712 minutes (the iPhone 7 talk time) anyway? Or 615 minutes (its browsing time)?
If we divide by 60, we find that you can talk continuously on an iPhone 7 for eleven hours and 52 minutes. At least we could using Which?’s simulated network. Sure, with a HTC you can talk for damned near 31 hours, and good on you if you want to do that. My ear starts to get tired after twenty minutes.