Price (RRP): $799/999
This is a combined review of the new Google Pixel 4a 5G and Pixel 5 5G because underneath they both have the same tech. So the question is do you spend $799 or $999 for a 5G enabled Pixel – or just get the back-to-basics Pixel 4a 4G at $599.
There are two schools of thought here. Those that want to buy 5G to add a little future-proofing. Or, those that realise 5G is one of the greatest marketing hoaxes perpetrated by Telcos to sell more to ill-informed customers. Hint: There is no killer app for 5G, and it is not ‘must-have’ at present.
Let’s address future-proofing. I would not bother about it. Let’s look a that in 2024 or later when your current phone dies and 5G is more ubiquitous.
And coverage. At present Australia has very limited, patchy sub-6Ghz 5G coverage (barely better than 4GX). In some so-called 5G coverage areas, you need to sit on the 5G tower to get a signal. Telstra says that its 2000 5G sites cover 41% of the population (map here), but the reality is mostly very sporadic and unreliable coverage in capital cities. So, unless you can get a strong 5G signal where you use the phone most then you are wasting money – it is just an overpriced 3 and 4G handset.
Sorry, Google. As you will see, the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Pixel 5 5G are fine phones, but the Pixel sweet spot is the 4a 4G (Review here, 4.6/5 $599) unless you have money to throw away.
Australian review: Google Pixel 4a 5G and Pixel 5 5G (Model G025I and GTT9Q)
- Website: Google Pixel 4a 5G here and Google Pixel 5 5G here
- Price: $799/999
- Colours: Just Black/Just Black and Sorta Sage
- Warranty: 2-years ACL
- From: Google online, JB Hi-Fi, Harvey Norman, Domayne, Officeworks, The Good Guys
- Country of manufacture: 4a 5G Vietnam and 5 5G CHina
- Google is part of Alphabet Inc – an American multi-national BIG TECH company. You can read more on Google as part of our ‘Can you Trust?’ series.
This is a review against parameters you can expect in a $799/999 device. We use FAIL, PASS and EXCEED against more than 70 test paradigms to arrive at a rating.
Grey market – no Australian warranty
Do not buy models with different model numbers (G025I and GTT9Q) – they are not for Australia and cannot register on its 5G network.
We issue the standard warning that you must buy the genuine model with Australian firmware as it works on all Australian Telco carrier LTE and 5G bands and can make a 000-emergency call (not 911) without a SIM.
We have named and shamed the major grey marketers here. If you are going to spend this much money, get a genuine ‘Made for Australia’ model.
First impression – PASS
Google has a certain style – minimalist and well, that is about it. I have two fairly innocuous black glass slabs sitting on the testbed, and I have to keep reminding myself that the 5 is smaller than the 4a. Innocuous in a bland but utilitarian way but I kind of miss the out-there orange/white of the 3XL.
Pixel is the embodiment of Pure Android – what can you can achieve with good hardware and Google Android. It is a reference design, so no money is wasted on ‘bling’ and fancy paint jobs. And it is timeless – even the Pixel 2 launched in October 2017 gets the Android 11 upgrade.
On the back is the distinctive camera dual-camera square bump (that does not make the phone rock on the desk) and a physical fingerprint reader button. Both have a flat-screen and an O-hole camera top left.
All tables following are the 4a (L) and 5 (R).
Screen – PASS
|Type||60HZ OLED with left top O-hole||60 or 90Hz adaptive OLED with left top O-hole|
|Resolution||2340 x 1080||same|
Tested 350 Typical/500Max
2 for sRGB
|Has major issues with Polarised glasses|
|DRM||DRM Info reports Widevine L1, HDCP 2.3 and an HDR10+ compatible decoder||Same|
|Gaming||Capable of most games at 30-60fps|
Has Snapdragon Elite Gaming feature
|90Hz screen and HDR10+ make this more of a gamer’s device|
|Protection||Gorilla Glass 3||Gorilla Glass 6|
|On rear cover|
Side-by-side the Pixel 5 has a much brighter and whiter screen. 90Hz is nice but after a week or so I went back to 60Hz for better battery life.
Nether has colour temperature so you can’t change the cool white of the 5 or the warm white of the 4a. This is a basic issue with Pure Google Android. There are no screen colour tuning settings apart from natural, boosted, and adaptive settings and these do little.
Neither screen ‘pops’ and the use of the term OLED instead of Samsung AMOLED makes me feel it is from another earlier generation, OLED supplier.
Readability – PASS but not great in direct sunlight
Other brands AMOLED screens are well ahead here for colour gamut coverage and tunability.
Processor – PASS
|SoC||Qualcomm SD765G 7nm|
1×2.4GHz + 1×2.2GHz + 6×1.8 GHz
|GPU||Adreno 620 Compute Open CL: 991||Same|
|RAM||6GB LPDDRX4||8GB LP:DDRX4|
|Storage||128GB UFS 2.1 (100GB free)|
|micro-SD||No, but unlimited storage at high quality with Google Photos||Same|
It is in between the SD730 and SD845 and comparable to other SD765G handsets
9% loss over 15 m
CPU temp reached 50°
10% loss over 15m
I think the Qualcomm SD765G is the Goldilocks SoC of the year – not too hot, not too cold, just right. It is used in the OPPO Find X2 Neo and Lite, OPPO Reno4, Nokia 8.3, LG Velvet, Motorola Edge, vivo X50 Pro 5G and many more to come.
The test results are within the ballpark for this SoC. But there is a significant difference between GIPS (billion instructions per second). The 4a is below average and the 5 above average.
Similarly, with Androbench, there are data transfer speed differences.
I can only put this down to chassis and manufacturing techniques – Vietnam versus China.
So the processor gets a PASS instead of PASS+ due to no micro-SD and reasonable performance differences from what we expect.
Comms – PASS
|Wi-Fi||Wi-Fi 5 AC 2×2 MIMO|
Signal Strength 5Ghz – distance from ASUS AX1100 router
– 2m: -33dBm/866Mbps
– 5m: -55dBm/650Mbps
– 10m: -56dBm/526Mbps
– 2m: -31/866
– 5m: -59/650
– 10m: -60/526
|Bluetooth||BT 5.0 and Google Cast||Same|
|USB-C||USB-C 3.1 Gen 1*||Same|
|Sensors||Proximity/Ambient light sensor Accelerometer/Gyrometer Magnetometer|
Spectral and flicker sensor
Ambient light sensor on the back as well
* Lack of proper USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 support – FAIL
Lack of a micro-SD slot should be no big issue as it supposedly supports USB-C 3.1 Gen 1. We could reasonably assume that also means ALT DP (external video) and data transfer speeds to 5Gbps – 625MBps.
What that means is that you should be able to get external SSD data speeds of up to 300/200MBps sequential read/write.
But we could not get more than 30MBps on a range of USB 3.0 flash drives and USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 and Gen 2 devices.
Similarly, it should support ALT DP (video out over USB-C), but we could not get it to do that either.
We did some further digging on XDA Developers and found Google Pixel 4a/5 5G do not support USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 standards that the SD765G Soc is capable of.
This is a significant issue for videographers and photographers that want a fast external backup or to view images on a monitor. Google Cast is 1080p, but this may go higher with the new 4K Google TV Dongle.
If you need this then Samsung Galaxy S/Note from S8, LG G5 or later, LG V20 or later and OPPO Find and Reno support this. There is a list here.
LTE and 5G – PASS
|SIM||Single plus eSIM (one active at a time)||Same|
|Support||VoLTE – carrier dependent – generally yes|
Wi-Fi calling – Yes
|As for 4a|
|UL (Mbps)||Ping 24|
Test: 35.8 Mbps
|DL (Mbps)||Test: 83.6 Mbps||75.3 Mbps|
|LTE Band||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71||Same|
|5G||Sub-6GHz n78 Australia|
Not mmWave capable – US and China models only
|Test||-107dBm in a 3-bar reception area (below average)|
Did not find adjacent towers
Note that the eSIM is registered/locked to the Australian Telco 5G carriers networks. That means grey market models likely won’t be able to access 5G. Once activated here you can use the eSIM overseas.
But as far as we can test the only 5G band enabled on both is sub-6Ghz n78. While the 5 is capable of mmWave the Australian box explicitly states, “Not compatible with 5G mmWave … sub-6Ghz only. Remember what we said about future-proofing – no mmWave makes this a less desirable device.
The LTE speeds are average for the range of SD756G phones tested. We can’t reliably test 5G at present more due to the vagaries of 5G speeds from second to second.
But the design indicates relatively weak antenna signal strength, so this is a city phone only.
Battery – PASS+
|Battery||3885mAh rated (3800 tested)||4040mAh rated (4000 tested)|
|Charger||Claim: All-day battery|
5V/3A and 9V/2A 18W PD 2.0 charger
USB-C full charge just under 2 hours
|Qi||No||Qi 10W (max 5V/2A)*|
Reverse Qi charge 2.5W (max 5V/.5A)*
Qi charge – just under 5 hours
|Tests||Video Loop: 1080p|
60Hz – 23 hr
90Hz – N/A
Typical use 4G, Wi-Fi
60Hz – 13hr
90Hz – N/A
MP3 music: 100hr
100% load drain
60Hz – 9 hrs
90Hz – N/A
60Hz – 1224m 2349 frames
90Hz – N/A
Drain screen off: 300mA (about 15 days)
60Hz -15 hrs
90Hz – N/A
|Video Loop 1080p|
60Hz – 23 hrs
90Hz – 18 hrs
Typical use 4G, Wi-Fi
60Hz – 11.5 hr
90Hz – 9.5 hr
MP3 music test – 86hr
100% load drain
60Hz – 8.5 hrs
90Hz – 6 hrs
60Hz – 833.4m 2460 frames
90Hz – 733.9m 2722 frames
Drain screen off: 300mA (about 15 days)
60Hz – 15 hours
90Hz – 12 hrs
* Using a battery charging monitor, it shows that the Pixel 5 charges at a maximum of approx., 5V/2A taking just under 5 hours for 100% charge. We tested with a Belkin 15W QI pad capable of delivering up to 3000mA (3A) to a Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
60Hz screen refresh gives the best battery time for both.
Note that the Pixel 5 has an aluminium back that prevents Qi charge. Indistinguishable under the painted back is a resin plastic cutout for Qi. But that means you must accurately place it on the charging pad – if you are off even a few cms, it can reduce the charge to a few hundred mA.
Sound – PASSable
|Speakers||Stereo earpiece ‘slit’ and down-firing speaker||Under screen speaker and down-firing speaker – called Acoustic surface audio|
2 x Cirrus Logic CS35i41 [email protected]%THD
|BT codecs||AptX, AptX HD, LDAC, AAC|
Qualcomm Aqusitic DAC
|Mic||Dual NC||Three NC|
|Buds||3.5mm standard mic and in-ear buds||USB-C standard buds|
Anything over 80dB is excellent
|Media – 80|
Ring – 80
Alarm – 80
Earpiece – 55
Hands-free – fine with adequate NR
Adequate – sound from the bottom speaker only
Sound stage – too narrow. It is impossible to match an earpiece speaker with a down-firing one. The 4a tries, but the bottom speaker is about 5dB louder, and this skews the sound stage to the bottom. It is not wider than the phone.
The 5 is not so lucky. While under glass speakers are not new (LG has used them), they are almost impossible to match volume or frequency response to a down-firing speaker. Why? Because they assume an ear will be nearby! The result is no bass and not enough volume on the to the speaker – not good for music.
To make matters worse, there are no EQ, balance setting or any sound processing. Again, this is part of Pure Android.
Both phones are good for clear vocals – calls.
Using our reference Sony WH-1000xM4 in SBC, AAC, aptX HD and LDAC (OPUS) modes provided good clear sound and plenty of volume.
The buds provided are 3.5mm and USB-C – standard types. Bass is a little muddy, and the focus is on mids. Treble is harsh.
Sound quality – PASS just
|Deep Bass: 20-40Hz||None||None|
|Middle Bass: 40-100Hz||None||None|
|High Bass: 100 to 200Hz||Gradually building||Gradually building|
|Low-mid: 200-400Hz||Building to flat||Still building to 300Hz|
|High-mid: 1-2kHz||Peaking at 2kHz||same|
|Low-treble: 2-4kHz||Steep dip and back up at 4kHz||flat|
|High Treble: 6-10kHz||build back to flat||Decline|
|Dog whistle: 10-20kHz||Nil||Gradual decline to 18kHz|
|Signature||Mid verging on Bright vocal||Bright vocal|
The two frequency response graphs show the Right speaker in Gold and Left in White. While the 4a is reasonably well-matched, the 5 is not. The top speaker is erratic, lacking tight control. And it has a very high-frequency response making sounds harsh.
Fortunately, you can listen via BT and get a clean L/R feed.
Build – PASS+
|Size/Weight||153.9 x 74 x 8.2mm x 168g||144.7 x 70.4 x 8mm x 151g|
|Colours||Just Black||Just Black and Sorta Green|
|Build||Front Glass: Gorilla Glass 3|
|Gorilla Glass 6|
|In the box||5V/3A and 9V/2A 18W charger|
USB-C to USB-C cable
USB-A (female) to USB-C male adapter
Google standard buds
Google USB-C buds
Good build quality but the 5 is well ahead on grip and IP68.
Android 10 – PASS+
|Android||Google Android 10|
Security patch date: 5 October
Security patch Note that security updates handled by Google in Android 11
|All standard apps, Google Lens and Assistant. Dedicated Google Assistant key.||Same|
|Bloatware||None – Google gets a medal!||Same|
|Update Policy||Minimum of three years of OS and security updates||Same|
FaceID – No
Titan M Chip
|Emergency call||000 if it detects a car crash||Same|
You may ask why it gets a PASS+. Well, the + is for the amazing three years of updates from Google. The PASS is because Pure Android lacks a lot of features that others build into UIs.
As a reference device, it is fine, but I have seen vastly better camera apps, more intuitive layouts, better sound controls and more screen controls in Samsung UI, OPPO ColorOS and realme UI.
Missing – No deal breakers
Camera – PASS+
Both use the same basic dual camera. Google is famous for getting the most out of its cameras by using computational photography. That means that the SD765G Soc and Arendo 615 GPU provide post-processing to a set of Google developed algorithms. Let’s see how they fare.
The camera setup differs from the 4a 4G in that the 16MP Ultra-wide replaces a telephoto. This means that there is no optical zoom – its all digital and post-processed.
Note – There are no significant differences in the shots between 4a and 5.
|Camera||Primary 12MP||Ultra-Wide 16MP||Selfie 8MP|
|Sensor||SONY IMX363||IMX481||Sony IMX355|
|Focus||AF dual pixel phase detection||AF||FF|
|Pixel size um||1.4||1||1.12|
|FOV° and cropped||77 (65.6)||107 (91)||83 (71.1)|
|Stabilisation||OIS and EIS||No||No|
|Video Max||[email protected]||[email protected]|
|Audio Zoom||Pixel 4a – no|
Pixel 5 – Yes
|Features||As provided by Google Camera app|
Indoors Office Light (400 lumen)
Low light (room with less <40 lumen)
The selfie is an 8MP, fixed focus, F2.0 lens with a 71.1° FOV. It is not quite wide enough for group selfies. And the manufactured image looks softer than it needs to be.
Standard Bokeh is way too aggressive virtually blurring anything but the subjects face. Personally I like to see some remaining definition to identify what things are in the background.
GadgetGuy’s take – Google Pixel 4a 5G and Pixel 5 5G are fine phones, but neither is class-leading
With sincere apologies to Google – these phones are not your best work. They remind me of the old school saying – just do enough to pass!
Maybe COVID delayed your launch and let others get in first. Perhaps your devotion to ‘Pure’ hardware and Android bit you this time.
Don’t get me wrong. Google Pixel fans will love these models, and they are safe buys. It is just that they barely passed all our test paradigms and exceeded in none. And I am quite concerned that USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 standards are mot implemented. It only achieves USB-A 2.0 speeds and no external video that would have made this phone stand out in the crowd.
Both Pixels are very close in terms of specs and performance. The 5 is the pick due to a 90Hz brighter OLED screen and IP68, but the 4a hits the right price point.
But I can’t help feeling that the 5 is a little too austere for a ‘flagship’. I love the SD765G Goldilocks SoC (just right), but it does not have the grunt that we expect of an SD8XX series. Yes, I know that adds a few hundred dollars.
Competition ($799-999 5G)
The $799-999 market segment is awash with new SD765G powered models. Yet due to COVID and no one having any spare cash, the segment has shrunk to less than 5% of overall sales. Its what marketers call a bloody red ocean!
- LG Velvet $899 4.9/5
- Motorola Edge $899 4.5/5
- OPPO Find X2 Neo $899 4.8/5
- OPPO Find X2 Lite $649 (was $749)
- Reno 4 $799 (review next week)
- Vivo X50 Pro $999 4.7/5
- Nokia 8.3 ($899 review soon)
- Samsung A71 128GB ($899 4.6/5 – uses Samsung Exynos chip)
- Samsung S20 FE 128GB ($999 review soon)
- Moto 9 (no details but release and review soon)
- Moto 9 Plus (ditto)
Not to mention a new breed of lower-cost 5G using the MediaTek Dimensity chip like the OPPO Reno4Z (review soon) or a new Qualcomm SD4 series that will start around $599
And then some truly excellent 4G phones that don’t have the 5G price penalty.
- Google Pixel 4a $599 4.6/5
- Realme X3 super zoom 256GB $749 4.9/5
- Realme 7 Pro 128GB $599 4.9/5
- Samsung A71 128GB $749 4.6/5
- Samsung Galaxy S10 128GB runout $869 4.9/5
A PASS mark is 4/5 to which we add points for EXCEEDING and deduct points for FAILING. On adding up our scores both PASSed but lost ground because of the USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 issues. But given it’s a Google Pixel with excellent Android updates/upgrades it claws back a point or so.
Interestingly the Google Pixel 4a scored 4.6/5, but you have to remember that it is for a $599 bracket device and presents excellent value. We wrote, “At $599 there is not a lot within $100 either way that I would buy. Maybe the OPPO A91 ($499 4.9/5) or Samsung A51 ($529) but both are sufficiently different to give the Pixel 4a the edge.”
So Google lovers – don’t pillory us – realise that these are fine handsets but face a huge battle for market share in the new 5G red ocean.
(Update) We have written a review companion for the Google Pixel 5 5G here that explains why the Pixel 5 5G scored 4.1/5 and why that should not matter if you want a 5G phone.