Australia’s first Samsung Galaxy S3 review

What bugs us

Not everything can be totally amazing with Samsung’s flagship. After all, it’s a new phone, and right from release, it would be foolish to expect the phone to be perfect.

Nothing is perfect, and we wouldn’t expect perfection even from a device trying its hardest to

First up is the battery life, and while we were initially keen to see such a massive battery on the S3, it doesn’t pan out quite as well as expected. The capacity of the S3’s battery is set to 2100mAh, higher than the 1650mAh in the past Galaxy S2 handset and higher than the average premium handset normally has (1400-1800mAh).

But while the number is impressive, the performance is really average. We suspect the bright 720p screen, always on face tracking software, and speedy processor severely hit the battery life, offering roughly one day of life on a charge.

It’s not quite as bad as the HTC One X, a handset that couldn’t even last a full work day with us, but it’s not too far off.

Like in the S2, Samsung does offer a power saving option which will give you quite a few more hours, but this happens as the expensive of the processor and screen brightness, handicapping each a little.

While we didn’t have the time to properly test this, we suspect that if you switch off the gimmicky face tracking features, you’ll find the battery life will improve.

We’re also a touch disappointed that Samsung hasn’t readied a 4G capable version of the S3 for release in Australia, but given the battery life, we’re not sure a quad-core LTE phone with a 720p screen and this much technology would actually work right now. The possible battery life on a beast like that actually scares us.

Another thing that bothered us was the build quality.

Unlike much of the competition, the S3 comes off feeling cheap and very plasticky, even moreso than the Galaxy S2.

Samsung has made improvements to the front panel of glass, pushing the technology to the latest version of Corning’s Gorilla Glass – “Gorilla Glass 2” – now thinner and offering more touchscreen responsivity and a brighter image.

While that’s awesome, it’s a stark contrast to the glossy plastic casing that completely surrounds the rest of the handset. The plastic back is incredibly slippery, ditching the textured backs we’ve seen on the S2, Galaxy Note, and Galaxy Nexus. It’s now easier to accidentally let go of, and feel greasy, almost dirty in your hands.

It’s certainly not the quality of the heavy plastic body of either the Nokia Lumia 800 or HTC One X, and doesn’t exude the same sense of strength you get from picking up the glass and aluminium Apple iPhone 4S.

The Galaxy S2 (left) and the Galaxy S3 (right). The new handset isn't much bigger, but manages to throw in a bigger screen, the 4.8 inch screen on the S3 bigger than the 4.3 inch on the S2.