Price (RRP): $699
The Nokia 8 Sirocco is a conundrum. On the good side, it is strangely compelling. On the other it has 5.5-inch, older style 16:9, POLED display and last year’s Qualcomm 835 SoC.
You are either going to overlook the conundrum and just buy it because it’s a Nokia and looks good. Not that there is anything wrong with last year’s Qualcomm super chip nor the older style 16:9 ratio screen.
Or you are going to eschew it and look for the new 18:9 screen, Qualcomm 845 SoC smartphones for a similar price.
In the box
- Nokia 8 Sirocco – Australian model TA-1005 (care other models will not work on all Telstra bands)
- Fast charger
- USB-C to USB-A cable
- Semi-transparent hard plastic bumper protector case
- Standard USB-C earbuds/mic
The first impression is a smaller, more squat shape with curves – 3D rounded edges. I like the looks despite a very prominent earpiece speaker slot. It feels solid (177g) and fits well in your hand.
Technical Specs – Nokia 8 Sirocco
Apologies for putting this up front but it is important if you are comparing with other smartphones on specs.
|Screen||5.5-inch, QHD, 2560 x 1440, 534ppi, 16:9, POLED, AOD, Gorilla Glass 5 front and back. 81.1% S-T-B-R, Curved edges|
|Processor||Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, (4×2.5 GHz Kryo & 4×1.8 GHz Kryo)|
|RAM||RAM/Storage: 6GB LPPDDR4X|
128GB USF 2.1 (113GB usable); OTG (no microSD slot)
Google Cloud unlimited photo storage
|Rear Camera 1||12 MP standard ((f/1.75, 1.4µm) Dual pixel phase detection auto-focus, Dual LED flash, HDR, face detection, OIS (see later), Zeiss lens, 2160 recording|
|Rear Camera 2||13 MP telephoto (f/2.6, 1.0µm), 2x optical zoom, Zeiss lens|
|Front Camera 1||5 MP (f/2.0, 1.4µm, 84°), 1080p recording|
|Comms||Wi-Fi AC, dual-band, MIMO Wi-Di,|
USB 3.1 (Gen 1 5Gb/s)
|Sound||Single earpiece speaker and smart amp|
24-bit/192kHz audio DAC
Nokia OZO audio with three mics (one dedicated to ANC) – ability to record up to 132dB.
USB-C to 3.5mm adapter (no 3.5mm audio jack)
|IP Rating||IP67 (1m water for 30 minutes), stainless steel frame|
|Other||Fingerprint sensor on the rear|
Does not support MHL video output over USB-C
Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0 supplied, 5V/3A, 9V/2A, 12V/1.5A. 50% in 30 minutes, full charge in 90 minutes
Qi wireless charge (Qi Charge pad required)
Endurance rating 77 hours.
|LTE||Cat 12/13 600/150; supports VoLTE|
|Dimensions||140.93 x 72.97 x 7.5 mm x 177|
|OS||Android One 9.x (pure Android monthly updates for the first two years and quarterly in year three)|
|Missing||3.5mm audio jack but USB-C to 3.5mm adapter provided|
No message status LED
No microSD slot
|Price||$1199 from JB Hi-Fi|
|Website||Australian website here|
Screen – 5.5-inch POLED
POLED is plastic OLED. It uses plastic instead of glass as the base layer. It is used by Google Pixel 2 XL and LG V30+ – the screen is made by LG. Simply it means the screens are about half the thickness of glass. In theory, they should be more flexible and resistant to pressure. The top layer is Gorilla Glass 5.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco uses a Pentile matrix – twice as many green pixels as red and blue ones.
Brightness is 400nits, black is 0 nits, and contrast is infinite. It is very similar in specs to the Galaxy S9.
Colours are vibrant and not adjustable. It has a blueish tint and is not quite as good at off-angle viewing.
In bright sunlight it is behind the S9 in readability – it is still in front of the best IPS LCD screens out there.
I like the Always on Display (AOD) that can show time, missed calls etc. It can be always on, glance activated or by picking up the phone.
The side edges are curved, and that can cause typing issues – I often found that the onscreen keyboard was not as responsive at the edge.
But given the QHD resolution, I challenge anyone to say its anything other than a nice display.
On paper, this should be a great camera
Standard lens – large 12MP sensor, 1.4µm pixels and a f/1.75 aperture should be amazing in low light.
The second telephoto is a 13MP with 1.0µm pixels and a f/2.6 lens. It provides the 2x optical zoom and bokeh effects (out of focus backgrounds).
HDR is automatic. It was off when I felt it needed to be on.
That said the outdoors shots (even on an overcast day) were as good as you will get. Indoors in office lighting, they were great, and in low light, we found too much noise and blur.
Camera summary – two out of three is not bad. Given the Zeiss heritage, we expected a little more. It is a few steps behind our reference camera the Samsung Galaxy S9+.
Outdoors – overcast
Colours were accurate. The clouds did look like that! It has a narrower field of view than many other cameras. Zoom shots were good and not pixelated.
This shot is at f/1.8, 1/1852 second, ISO50 and is 3.7MB
Indoors – office lights (the standard dog shot)
Colours were accurate with no casts evident on the background cupboards. The fur on the left side of the toy dog is slightly blown out from the external windows about 5 metres away.
This shot is at f/1.8, 1/50 second, ISO 50 and is 2.9MB.
Indoors low light
We found it very hard to get a clear picture. It turns out that there is no Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS) on the standard lens – that in our opinion is a major oversight.
When we used a tripod, we did get an acceptable low-light shot, but it was noisy, lacked fine detail and exaggerated colours. I suspect it relies on the EIS (Electronic image stabilisation) provided in post-processing by Qualcomm’s chip.
This shot is at f/1.8. 1/25second, ISO 200.
It has Bothie – the ability to livestream from both the forward and rearward facing cameras.
Bokeh and 2x Zoom – works well.
Panorama – 3000 pixels tall and no stitching lines. Love the ability to pan in any direction – not just left to right.
Selfies – a decent job with a 5MP, 1.4µm pixel but no OIS means it blurs in lower light.
It will do up to [email protected] but loses all EIS so it can be jerky. When using a tripod, it was crystal clear except when panning.
It is more suited to [email protected] (will not do 60fps). One thing to keep in mind is internal storage. It is 128GB – no microSD to record longer large files to.
It has Nokia OZO audio with three mics (one dedicated to ANC) can record up to 132dB. Stereo separation and clarity was good.
Still, camera summary – The Nokia 8 Sirocco is behind the top five Android phones
Samsung Galaxy S9 (series), Huawei P20 Pro, Sony XZ2, HTC U12 Pro, LG G7 V30+ ThinQ have better low-light cameras.
The single earpiece speaker is not Hi-Fi. It was great for ringer volume and voice (80dB) and achieved 76dB for music. But the speaker is poor at music having no bass or treble – it is an upper-mid-signature for clear voice which it does well.
When paired to a Sony WH-1000XM2 Bluetooth headset (rated as one of the best Bluetooth headphones) it recorded a flat frequency response from 50Hz to 10kHz. High-end treble (that you can’t hear) dropped off markedly. Volume was slightly lower on this test that with other smartphones. This is due to the smartphone, not the headset.
The supplied buds were average. Sounds were very thin, again more mid-focused. Nokia has IP55 Active Wireless Earphones (not tested) that would be a better bet. Frequency response is 20Hz-20kHz (but that depends on the device). In short use Bluetooth buds – any type.
For the money, the Nokia 8 Sirocco should have had at least stereo speakers.
GadgetGuy has been inundated with smartphone reviews now so we could only use this for a day, instead of a week, of hard testing.
It appears to use more power than expected. At 8 am with a full charge, we took about 50 photos, did speed and GPS tests, and generally played until 10 am. By this time, it had 69% battery left.
Then we used it as normal (phone, web browsing and apps) until 8 pm it had 20% battery. By 10 pm the battery saver had kicked in at 15%
The three top app usage included the camera (30%), GPS (12%) and screen (21%). Admittedly we had ramped the screen up to 70% brightness and had a five-minute time-out.
This is a one-day phone that would benefit from having a few Qi charging pads strategically placed around the home and office.
Recharge using the fast charger was about 90 minutes.
Last year we all called the 835 a super chip. This year it’s about 20% slower in single core and 30% in multi-core tests than the Qualcomm 845.
The issue here is the 845 is a significant jump over the 835. From a future-proof perspective, if you are spending $1199, there are 845 SoC in other brands available.
Wi-Fi AC performance was lower than expected. For some unknown reason, it would only connect to a D-Link AC5300 dual band router in 2.4GHz mode at 173MB/s. Every other phone on test connected at 866 or even 1.2GB/s.
Telstra 4G data speeds were 120MB/s (compared to 300Mb/s average).
Pure Android – now at 9.x
During the review, it went to Android 8.1 (an incremental update from 8.0) and security patch June 2018. Nokia claims it will provide monthly updates for two years and quarterly updates from the third year.
And in January 2019 it is now Android 9. This adds a lot of new features (untested)
- App Actions – Helps you get things done faster by predicting your next move and displaying the right action on your phone
- Slices – Identifies relevant information of your favourite apps to make them more easily accessible when you need them
- Adaptive Battery – Uses deep learning to understand usage patterns and prioritise battery power on important apps
- Adaptive Brightness – Automatically adapts phone brightness by learning from your interactions
- New system navigation – Features a single home button that provides intelligent predictions and suggestions (user enabled)
- Digital Wellbeing features – Highlight different types of phone usage, set limits on app usage and a daily schedule to help users wind down
Pure Android means all the standard Google apps. The exceptions are
- camera app that is a lot more comprehensive in the Pro mode
- Nokia Mobile Care (download from Google Play)
GadgetGuy’s take – I wanted to really like the Nokia 8 Sirocco
It is a lovely phone from an iconic brand. It is desirable for that alone. Support Nokia especially if you are a Nokia fan – you won’t be disappointed.
But after testing so many other recent flagship class smartphones, I can’t help but feel Nokia has missed the boat.
A 16:9 screen feels outdated. The lack of OIS when Nokia is all about Zeiss cameras is a major oversight. The use of last year’s flagship chip (although not an issue for most) means it is behind the pack instead of leading it.
So, it is good, more than competent, but a step or so behind the main contenders.
Launch price was $1199 – as of January 2019, it is $699 at JB Hi-Fi – a bargain for what it is.
- Luxury design
- Android One
- 6/128GB and unlimited Google Photo cloud storage (data charges may apply)
- Qi charge
- The camera does not match or better top five flagship alternatives
- Last year’s flagship processor
- No microSD slot
- No notification led
- Sound optimised for voice – not music
- POLED screen colour cast is noticeable off angle
Ratings – Nokia 8 Sirocco
Reassessed at $699 (January 2019)
- Overall 4
- Features: 4 out of 5 – missing OIS, 3.5mm jack, older 16:9 screen
- Value for Money: 4 out of 5 – at $799 this would be a bargain and outperform most mid-upper-range phones. At $1099 it is not.
- Performance: 4 out of 5 – let down by its speaker and camera
- Ease of Use: 4 out of 5 – easy to install and use
- Design: 4 out of 5 – nice but a 16:9 screen makes it look too squat
Nokia 8 Sirocco, Nokia 8 Sirocco.